名称: | |
描述: | |
公开/私有: | 公开 私有 |
Ordering power : contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia / |
|
ISBN/ISSN:
|
9780521165457 (pbk.) |
ISBN/ISSN:
|
0521165458 (pbk.) |
ISBN/ISSN:
|
9780521190411 |
ISBN/ISSN:
|
052119041X |
中图分类法
:
|
D733.02 |
著者:
|
Slater, Dan, |
题名:
|
Ordering power [contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia ] |
出版发行:
|
Cambridge ; : Cambridge University Press, 2010. |
载体形态:
|
xviii, 319 p. : ill., map ; 24 cm. |
内容提要:
|
"Like the postcolonial world more generally, Southeast Asia exhibits tremendous variation in state capacity and authoritarian durability. Ordering Power draws on theoretical insights dating back to Thomas Hobbes to develop a unified framework for explaining both of these political outcomes. States are especially strong and dictatorships especially durable when they have their origins in "protection pacts": broad elite coalitions unified by shared support for heightened state power and tightened authoritarian controls as bulwarks against especially threatening and challenging types of contentious politics. These coalitions provide the elite collective action underpinning strong states, robust ruling parties, cohesive militaries, and durable authoritarian regimes - all at the same time. Comparative-historical analysis of seven Southeast Asian countries (Burma, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Vietnam, and Thailand) reveals that subtly divergent patterns of contentious politics after World War II provide the best explanation for the dramatic divergence in Southeast Asia's contemporary states and regimes"--Provided by publisher. |
主题词:
|
Authoritarianism Southeast Asia. |
标签:
|
|
相关资源:
|
|
分享资源:
|
HEA| |03015cam a2200373 a 4500 001| |022011000885 003| |CAL 005| |20101019140140.3 008| |100330s2010 enkab b 001 0 eng 010| |▼a 2010013569 020| |▼a9780521165457 (pbk.) 020| |▼a0521165458 (pbk.) 020| |▼a9780521190411 020| |▼a052119041X 024|8 |▼a40018384293 035| |▼a(DLC) 2010013569 040| |▼aDLC▼cDLC▼dYDX▼dYDXCP▼dUKM 042| |▼apcc 043| |▼aae----- 050|00|▼aJQ750.A58▼bS53 2010 093| |▼aD733.02▼24 099| |▼aCAL 022010213871 100|1 |▼aSlater, Dan,▼d1971- 245|10|▼aOrdering power :▼bcontentiou- | |s politics and authoritarian l- | |eviathans in Southeast Asia /▼- | |cDan Slater. 260| |▼aCambridge ;▼aNew York :▼bCam- | |bridge University Press,▼c2010. 300| |▼axviii, 319 p. :▼bill., map ;▼c24 cm. 490|1 |▼aCambridge studies in compara- | |tive politics 504| |▼aIncludes bibliographical ref- | |erences and index. 505|8 |▼aMachine generated contents n- | |ote: Part I. The Puzzles and A- | |rguments: 1. To extract and to- | | organize; 2. States and the r- | |egimes that run them; Part II.- | | Contentious Politics and the - | |Institutions of Order: 3. Colo- | |nialism, cleavages, and the co- | |ntours of contention; 4. Mobil- | |ization and countermobilizatio- | |n amid colonial retreat; 5. Va- | |rieties of violence in authori- | |tarian onset; Part III. The Fo- | |undations and Fates of Authori- | |tarian Leviathans: 6. Protecti- | |on and provision in authoritar- | |ian leviathans; 7. Contentious- | | politics and the struggle for- | | democratization; Part IV. Ext- | |ending the Arguments: 8. Congr- | |uent cases in Southeast Asia; - | |9. The consequences of contention. 520| |▼a"Like the postcolonial world- | | more generally, Southeast Asi- | |a exhibits tremendous variatio- | |n in state capacity and author- | |itarian durability. Ordering P- | |ower draws on theoretical insi- | |ghts dating back to Thomas Hob- | |bes to develop a unified frame- | |work for explaining both of th- | |ese political outcomes. States- | | are especially strong and dic- | |tatorships especially durable - | |when they have their origins i- | |n "protection pacts": broad el- | |ite coalitions unified by shar- | |ed support for heightened stat- | |e power and tightened authorit- | |arian controls as bulwarks aga- | |inst especially threatening an- | |d challenging types of content- | |ious politics. These coalition- | |s provide the elite collective- | | action underpinning strong st- | |ates, robust ruling parties, c- | |ohesive militaries, and durabl- | |e authoritarian regimes - all - | |at the same time. Comparative-- | |historical analysis of seven S- | |outheast Asian countries (Burm- | |a, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Ph- | |ilippines, Singapore, South Vi- | |etnam, and Thailand) reveals t- | |hat subtly divergent patterns - | |of contentious politics after - | |World War II provide the best - | |explanation for the dramatic d- | |ivergence in Southeast Asia\'s - | |contemporary states and regime- | |s"--Provided by publisher. 650| 0|▼aAuthoritarianism▼zSoutheast Asia. 651| 0|▼aSoutheast Asia▼xPolitics and- | | government▼y21st century. 830| 0|▼aCambridge studies in compara- | |tive politics. 998| |▼aCALIS